Thursday, 20 December 2012

21-2012 and the prophesy

The Prophesy – an unnoticed event
The wheel turns full circle – this is the dawn of the end of days for now destiny turns against the Beast (this is not the End of the World but the Dawn of a New Beginning for Humanity – a time for choice a time of challenge and a time for change)
0 (zero) – too late it has begun – this is not the end of the world it is the dawn of what is to come
22 - 2012
Comes 1st Angel – You will recognise him for he is ‘Death’ an walks hand in hand with ‘Life and Birth’ - here upon the plains of ‘Arm’ and ‘Eden’ (Arm-ag-Edon) shall he prepare the field of battle for soon cometh the Lord and Judgement with him for he knows where within and upon what he stands since this is his fathers kingdom which you the Beasts have desecrated and destroyed.

“Comes the one in ‘Gods fine Fleece’ that one whom shall do wonders!”

Soon he will  leave the forests and the mountains to stand upon the plains where all shall see him and here shall he do battle with the Beast – the rest is written and as it is written so shall it be done!

Personaly I think 2013 is a year of change for everyone upon the planet with people in every country on earth having no confidence in either Justice, Government or State, taxation will be exposed as the new bonds of slavery driven through impoverishment with Authorities failing worldwide. Clearly a system failure is on the cards since no politician nor person of authority can take responsibility for their crimes or failures within neither them nor the state; they therefore perpetuate their crimes through evasion, corruption, fraud and deception none of which the public employees nor authorises them to project - this may be the year when we actually establish 'Legitimacy within the Law' through a forced recognition and acceptance of what 'is lawful over what is not' with this becoming established through the provision of 'Lawful Service' as a 'Mandatory Obligation'.

Additionally to the above I believe the 'Free-Wolf' will come into being as a fulfillment of the 'Prophesy' which is at least 2,500 yers old, clearly this will become a year of change either way.


Saturday, 10 November 2012

‘Electing a Police and Crime Commissioner’

The State of Injustice

‘Electing a Police and Crime Commissioner’

My apologies for not writing anything for a while I have been busy working in other fields, recently I received a ‘Polling Card’ allowing me to ‘Vote’ within the ‘Election’ of a ‘Police’ and ‘Crime Commissioner’ for ‘North Wales’.

The election is due to take place upon the 15th of November 2012.

The ‘Polling Card’ allocates for ‘Four Police approved Nominees’ none of which represent or serve the interests of the ‘Public’; who and for the record have ‘No’ recognisable ‘Right in Law’ to nominate someone ‘Impartial’ from within their ‘Own Community’ as a ‘Person Trusted by the Public’ to ‘Serve and represent the Interests of the Public’ (Without Prejudice). Thus being able to ‘Investigate Complaints by the Public’ and ‘Against the Police’ not upon the ‘Original Police Investigation’ or ‘Allegation’ which allocates for the ‘Police to Evade Responsibility through Prejudice’ but more importantly upon the ‘Community Court and/or Crown Court Tapes, Transcripts, Video and Audio Records’ with them representing the ‘Sum of All the Evidences’ (Evidences which have stood up to the Scrutiny of Cross Examination). 

Clearly and as a ‘Victim’ of State Crime’ and ‘Police Abuses of Authority’ (Public Trust) additionally and since ‘I have No Human’ or any other ‘Lawfully Perceived Rights’ within ‘English and/or European Law’ furthermore ‘No Right in Law to Receive Justice without Prejudice’ (only Prejudicial Justice) I do not and will not ‘Sanction and/or Endorse Criminal Authorities’ whom ‘Abuse their Positions of Trust’ along with ‘An Abuse’ of the ‘Public’ then ‘Evade Responsibility’ for the ‘Crimes and Abuses’ they are clearly ‘Guilty’ of having ‘Committed’.
As ‘Public Employees’ (Public Servants) they have ‘No Right in Law’ to ‘Abuse those Positions’ save through the ‘Abuse of Law’ which is a ‘Crime’ highlighting ‘Intent’ (an intention to commit).

“Violating Peoples Rights in Law is an Attack upon Every Persons Right”.

Clearly any ‘Prejudicial, Closed or Rigged Election’ is not a lawful election since when you are presented with ‘Limited or Restricted Choice’ with no right to amend and/or make an ‘Independent Choice’ then ‘What choice do you have’. ‘People’ elected through ‘Prejudicial, Staged and Rigged Elections’ to ‘Positions of Abuse’ are ‘Criminals’ since they ‘Serve with Prejudice’ and are ‘Elected with Intent’. Personally I do not endorse ‘Crime or Criminality’ and will not sanction or endorse corrupt authorities whom have no intention of providing the public with ‘Lawful Service’ and ‘No Intention of Admitting’ to any greater charge than ‘Malpractice’ (a lesser charge that allows the authorities to evade ‘Accountability over Serious Abuses’ such as ‘Murder, Conspiracy, Deception, Fraud, Perverting Justice’ (Treason) etc.

Every ‘Crime is a Crime against Someone’ (Victim) that if it is allowed to go unpunished becomes a ‘Socially Acceptable Crime’ (Legalised Crime) which denies ‘Someone’ (the Victim) ‘Justice’ through a ‘Failure’ upon the part of the ‘Public & those Authorities’ to ‘Recognise’ through ‘Public or Social Awareness’ that a ‘Crime has been Committed’ also that ‘it is or indeed was a Crime’.

There are numerous people ‘Highlighted within the Media’ in recent and current histories who have been ‘Unlawfully Killed’ by these ‘National Authorities’. Furthermore ‘None’ of these ‘Authorities’ have ‘Accepted or Admitted’ to their ‘Crimes’ and ‘Evasion highlights Intent’; clearly ‘Shooting’ an ‘Innocent man’ in the face ‘Five Times’ at ‘Point Blank’ range is a ‘Crime’; additionally this ‘Crime’ is compounded by the ‘Fact that the Victim was Innocent in Law’ therefore the ‘Police were Guilty’ with that ‘Guilt being Compounded through an Intention to Evade Responsibility for the Crime’.

Evasion of responsibility does not make you ‘Innocent’ it highlights an intention to ‘Evade Responsibility’ compounding your ‘Guilt through that Intention’ additionally the ‘Authorities’ despite their ‘measure of Authority’ have ‘No Right in Law’ to commit ‘Crimes’ or evade responsibility for those ‘Crimes Committed’.

Hitting a ‘Non Confrontational Man’ with a ‘Police Baton’ over the back of his head whilst he was ‘Walking away from you’ his hands lowered on each side of him in a ‘Passive Posture’ was a ‘Deliberate Crime’. A ‘Police Baton‘ is a ‘Lethal Weapon’ and this is compounded by the ‘Fact’ that the ‘Police’ are trained within the use of this ‘Weapon’; part of that ‘Training’ consist around the ‘Use of that Baton’ which should only be used in ‘Defence’ with it being employed to the ‘Legs and Arms’ as a means of ‘Disabling your Opponent’. Within this it is ‘Rigorously Drummed into the Officers Psyche’ that the baton ‘Which is a Lethal Weapon’ should not be used within the regions of a ‘Persons Head, Neck nor Shoulders’ as such ‘Force may cause Life Threatening Injuries’ (the application of Force being an Issue here as is the application of the Weapon to sensitive areas of the Human Body – it Highlights an intention to Inflict Serious Injury).

My book: ‘The State of Injustice’ clearly highlights my reasons for not participating within this ‘Prejudicial Election’ which is ‘Designed through prejudice to appease the Public’ (the Police giving the impression that they will Investigate Public Complaints against the Police when they have No Intention of Accepting or Admitting to Guilt upon their part). This is just one of those ‘Protocols’ the ‘State’ puts into place so as to ‘Appease the Masses’ and is just a ‘Deceit’ designed to ‘Pacify the Public’.

I personally do not ‘Trust them nor do I Respect them’ since when the ‘Police Lie under Oath, Conspire with Criminals, enter False Physical Evidences within Courts of Law then Pervert Justice through Prejudice’ it simply does not leave any room for either ‘Trust nor Respect’. I have NO HUMAN RIGHTS due to their CRIMINALITY and the FAILURE of the ENGLISH Authorities to recognise or ADMIT to THEIR CRIMES which further compounds the DAMAGE DONE.

There is ‘No Justice within Abuse’ and the ‘Public are getting Smarter’ (Not Stupid but Aware) so it is a question of ‘Time’ before these ‘Authorities are brought to Justice’ – “the clock ticks steadily onwards”.

Christopher © 10/11/12

In this Negative (-) reality
A Black flame burns
Within a Bloody Red World
It burns with Intent

Christopher © 2012 (All Rights Reserved)


In preparation for war: I would willingly take a hundred years to plan my retaliatory attack; I would leave nothing to chance since I would prepare for both the unexpected and the intended by conceiving the possibility of impossibilities.

Understand: that the concept of war is not necessarily about winning it is to totally crush thereby destroy your enemy; within this action I would gladly deliver into the hands of my Enemy all the ammunition they would ever wish to acquire then use against me ‘wisdom within the argument’.

Here through this action there is understanding: since through that gift I will gain control over my Enemy thus limiting and minimizing the damage done to me by them, however they have no such control and no such assurances.
‘An Enemy is only as powerful as you make them’.

Control the action by directing your enemy ‘moment by moment’ to where you want them to be: within this recognise that any action you are prepared for has no power since it is expected. Any action which is perceived and that was outside your control is also expected therefore it was strategized into existence (you planned and prepared for it); it was predicted since you conceived of the possibility therefore it was intended to happen – ‘an anticipated action relates to a calculated reaction’.

Only fear what you cannot envisage: since that is your failure ‘Do Not Act upon the Spur of the Moment’ – ‘Take your Time’ then and only when ‘You’ are ready ‘Attack’ with ‘Equal Deliberate Intent’. Do not delude yourself with ambitions of winning and refrain from being the Perpetrator make this a Retaliatory Action – (Become an Icy Cold Intellect) – measure the depth of your enemies ‘Callousness’ and ‘Indifference’ to both you and others find their ‘Other Victims’ and you find their ‘Enemies’ thereby ‘Allies’ within this ‘Your Response’ will be Magnified (+).

Time: This is not an issue, take your Time and plan with great detail every conceivable action and/or inaction, know your enemy since ‘Readiness is Preparation’ whilst ‘In Loss cost your Enemy Everything – Your Defeat is their End’ – Understand them via their every move every thought and every gesture – Know them like you know yourself and be Truthful within this since strategy should be related as a Matter of Fact.

Draw out your enemy: Place him where you want him to be; do not be distracted by his decoys, ploys or persuasions ‘Control the Moment’ – I would stand in the Heart of Hell myself as bait if I could draw my enemy to that place of my choosing since that sacrifice pales in comparison and against the object of my stratagem which is not only to defeat mine enemy it is to Quash mine Enemy – The point of Justice is to exact Punishment and the object of Retaliation is to exact Revenge – if you have been unfairly attacked then remember your suffering, use it since it is a Strength – “I am Determined through Pain”.

“This sword was forged in Hells Fire and I keep it Sharp”.

1.      Only a fool insights war since all wars cost

2.      If you are the victim of an unprovoked attack then realise that the attack was deliberate.

3.      Do not respond to the attack upon your Enemies terms – become clinical within this that your response becomes Poignant.

4.      Deliberate your attack carefully – control each moment as you control their each and every action (study them well for detail is everything) – Know that Beast by their Every Move and Gesture.

5.      The object of Strategy is to destroy your Enemy and is not necessarily about Winning – Show No Mercy since your Response is a Reaction to an Attack therefore a Provocation for and within this your Enemies Action was both Cold and Deliberate.

6.      Do not delude or deceive yourself with ambitions of winning since it is Not the Object – plan to lose by the worst scenario because within this you will find wisdom – Your End is their Defeat – leave nothing to Chance (there is wisdom here) “understand the Worst Scenario then build upon it”.

7.      The object of Revenge is to win ‘Justice’ but that concept of Justice cannot remove the Crime, Pain or Suffering and Compensation means nothing to the ‘Just Victim’.

8.      Strategy is not about winning it is about Defeating your Enemy by any means necessary and at any cost, this to include the sacrifice of you yourself since that price is irrelevant against the object which is to ‘Destroy your Enemy’.
9.      Come that decisive moment within the battle leave your enemy with nothing not even a breath of air, express no mercy since you are standing there as a Response to an Unprovoked Attack – fix your mindset cold and clinical within the intention.

10. Clearly I am mine own sword - “Cold is the heart that Fixes my Mind – Resolute and Unmoving”.
11. Mine Enemies Rules mean Nothing to me – bonds of SLAVERY

12. His rules and regulations serve as my Chains of Bondage inhibiting and restricting me from applying for justice whilst allowing him to control my suffering and each moment thereby limiting the extent of my action and through this control of law I am enslaved. Understanding this fundamental point changes everything since it ‘Frees my hands and frees my Mind’ as to release thereby ‘Control my Body, my Destiny and this Futures Outcome’.

13. Envisage what is Possible then envisage what is Not Possible; now realise that what You have Perceived is Prejudiced since it is Perspective and just because You cannot Perceive something as being either Possible or Not that does not mean to say your Enemy perceives something in the same way – Re-evaluate your considerations – apply your mind to understanding this state.

14. “I am War” – I did not ask to be here however here I am forged in Fire – there is purpose in this.

15. Psychology – Fix this thought within your mind: ‘RETALITORY therefore JUSTICE’.

16. Strength – my greatest strength is also my greatest weakness and ‘vice versa’ (I have two hands but my weak hand is my strength) within this my best hand is hidden and ‘What you See is not necessarily what you Get’.

17. Planning – Time is a temporal state – rush nothing when planning a stratagem – plenty of time (you have a life time) and don’t be afraid to take longer since your descendants can deliver the message for you – Justice has no limits or bonds – you can take forever – (Justice is a Bitter Pill).
18. Pre-Action – do not be afraid to test your planning nor to amend it as required – no plan is flawless until it has been tested again and again – Time is not an issue here.

19. Action – You have strategized and prepared for every contingency even those other strategists would have dismiss, you have exhaustively scrutinized your plan (testing it as required) - now Commit Yourself without Hesitation nor Reservation and Fear Nothing.

20. Commitment – Show No Mercy whilst remembering that Your Enemy expressed None; ‘Cold is the Heart which Fixes your Mind Resolute and Unmoving’.
21. Done!
“Walk away without a second thought; never look back since they (Your Enemy) are unworthy of consideration”.

Christopher © 2012 (All Rights Reserved)

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Criminal Injustice

            This is a ‘True Factual Issue’ in which the current ‘Grand Architect’ of the ‘European World Order’ (Anthony Blair) instigated and introduced ‘Closed Courts’ within the ‘United Kingdoms’ so as to ‘Prosecute People’ with ‘Prejudice’ – his argument being to ‘Streamline an Antiquated System’ with this allowing for the ‘State’ to gain ‘Higher Numbers of Convictions’ against ‘Political Undesirables’.

            For the record: “A Political Undesirable is Anyone whose Views or Perspectives Highlights and/or Exposes State Abuses or Any State Crimes; they may also relate to People whose views are not in keeping with or Oppose the Politics and Ambitions of the State – Any Alternate Political party such as the Nationalist Parties  as Unilateral representatives can be perceived as opposing Multilateral parties since one Represents: a ‘Nations Right to Independence’ and ‘Cultural Unity’ whilst the other represents a Multiple of Nations Rights to ‘Abuse’ that Nation through ‘Domination and Control’. Within this you may be Complacent today but there are no guarantees that your Children will be Compliant Tomorrow with Injustice and State Crimes Impacting upon everyone through that scale of Complacency and/or Acceptability”.

            Within the Above – Just because You Stand By to make it Acceptable for the State to commit Crime does not mean your Children will stand by or Sanction what will then be an Extension of State Abuses brought about by ‘You’ who Publically Endorsed State Crimes.

Furthermore it should be Noted: that it may not be those Nations of Peoples whom endorse these Crimes but a Minority Group of peoples All of whom We Elect and Trust and All of whom are Betraying us by Directing Our Resources Against both Us (as Individuals) and Others (as Collectives of Individuals) for Political or Self Gain. Within this those Multilateral Peoples from within Other Nations may actually have no say in how their Resources are being Abused or the Scale of Abuses which are being Committed in their Name. Just because you hold ‘Elections’ within which you ‘Vote’ and ‘Elect People’ to represent you does not in any way ‘Infer’ or ‘Guarantee’ that those ‘People’ will serve and represent you ‘Lawfully’ since the fact is that they only stand because of ‘Ambition’ and that highlights ‘Ulterior Motives’.

            Clearly without ‘Public Representation’ there are ‘No Assurances’ or ‘Evidences’ to support the ‘Fact’ that these ‘Proceedings’ have or are being conducted ‘Lawfully’ with them being ‘Built and Based’ upon the ‘Sum of All the Evidences’  all of which have been ‘Lawfully Collected’ and ‘Presented as Evidences’ (Without Prejudice) and ‘All’ of which having been ‘Gathered, Scrutinised and Correlated’ so as to establish their ‘Legitimacy and Lawfulness’. Clearly within this ‘Members of the Public’ serve the ‘Interests of the Public at large’ whereas ‘Politicians serve themselves through Political Ambition’.

            To date there are ‘No Evidences’ to ‘Prove’ that these ‘Trials’ are ‘Not Racially’ and/or ‘Politically Motivated’ since ‘Closed Courts conceal the Facts’ additionally they also highlight and expose ‘Political Motives’ and ‘Abuses’ since ‘Evidences’ which normally have to stand up to the ‘Scrutiny of Cross Examination’ within ‘Open Courts’ are ‘Now Accepted with Prejudice’ – ‘Convictions’ being ‘Based and Built’ upon ‘Allegations and Evidences’ none of which are supported and All of which are Questionable.

            A Jury represents the Public at Large and are incorporated into a Court of Law so as to ensure the Lawfulness within the Proceedings thereby offer Assurances that the Accused is in deed the Lawfully Accused with Evidences supporting a case in law. Clearly there are no Guarantees or Evidences of this within Closed Courts or cases whereby the Public are Omitted – Injustice is a Crime.

            ‘Trials without Juries’ is a ‘Trial without Justice’ since every Jury is made up of ‘Indiscriminate Peoples’ who are taken from ‘Every walk of Life’ they are therefore the ‘Nations Representatives’ and exist to ‘Ensure’ that the ‘State’ along with the ‘Government’ and its ‘Authorities’ conduct themselves ‘Lawfully’ thus ensuring for the ‘Benefit of All’ that not only is ‘Justice Lawful’ but also that ‘Justice is Done’.

There are no such ‘Assurances’ within ‘Closed Courts’ therefore ‘Hidden Proceedings’ are conducted outside the ‘Scrutiny of Public Opinion’ with no Recognisable Evidences relating to the measure of ‘Peoples Human Rights’, the ‘Lawfulness of Evidences’ or the ‘Measure of Justice an Individual Receives’ since they are outside the ‘Lawful Observations’ and ‘Awareness of Human Rights Organisations’.

I have an issue within this – Any failure of Authority to Defend the Human Rights of even One Individual undermines their Own Human Rights as Individuals and/or Collectives of Individuals with All Authority being based and built upon Trust – That Authority can be Revoked – with any Abuse of Authority exposing a Breach of Trust. People within positions of trust don’t seem to realise how vulnerable they are because all it actually takes is ‘One Case’ whereby the ‘Public become Aware’ of the sheer scale of ‘Political Corruption’ and this ‘Awareness’ is starting to take place in ‘Every Country on Earth’.

“There is no justice within injustice as that simply projects Corruption and a failure of the state to uphold the Legitimacy of Law – there has to be Legitimacy within the Law coupled with the recognition of what is Legitimate and Lawful over what is Not”.

Christopher © 2012 (All Rights Reserved)

Sunday, 9 September 2012

The State of Injustice

“The Little steps we take make for Giant Strides later”
Take your time reading this page; consider these issues carefully so that when you relate these issues to other people you fully understand what you are talking about – this understanding can only expand the depth of your consciousness.

You do not have to ‘Agree’ with this nor any other ‘Issue I am Raising’ but the conscious awareness that there are in deed ‘Issues’ impacts upon both ‘You through that Awareness’ and the ‘Whole of Humanity’ by making people ‘Realise through Understanding’ that some ‘Problems within Authority’ needs to be dealt with.

“I cannot change the World upon myself however I can become Conscious through Sympathetic Awareness with my actions impacting upon others thereby having a Cumulative Effect”.

As you browse the internet searching out cases of ‘Injustice’ there are some ‘Issues’ you will discover more than any other:

1.      The sheer scale of ‘System Abuses’ by the people ‘We Elect’ into ‘Office’ with that ‘Election’ being based upon ‘Trust’; their ‘Failure as People’ is that they are ‘Completely Untrustworthy’ they project ‘False Claims, Images and Promises’ with ‘No Intention of Honouring them’ additionally they are completely ‘Indifferent’ to both the ‘Public as Individuals’ and their ‘Nation as a Whole’ this clearly highlighting an ‘Intent’ upon their ‘Part to Deceive, Defraud and Betray’ the ‘Public’ (US).

2.      Many Serious Issues are ‘Drowned’ beneath the ‘Scale of the Crimes’ all of which deserve ‘Scrutiny’; in addition to this ‘Not one single Agency on Earth is visibly dealing with these Issues’. Furthermore neither the ‘Court of Human Rights’ nor any other ‘System’ is actively ‘Coping’ because they are ‘Overwhelmed by the Sheer Scale of Political Abuses’ which are being ‘Expressed and Projected by the Peoples’ from within ‘Every Country’.

The fact that this is a Global Issue highlights a far greater Problem all of which relate to Authority through Political and Judicial Abuses.

3.      Realistically this is a ‘Global Problem’ which relates to ‘Every Country on Earth’ and can be put down to: ‘Firstly Us’ each and every one of us has to take 'Responsibility' because of ‘Complacency’ on ‘Our Part’. Additionally: ‘We All Delegate Far Too Much Authority’ entrusting it to ‘Other people’ none of whom are ‘Trustworthy’.

The problem here is that it allocates for ‘State Failures’ and ‘State Crimes’ because the ‘Minority Groups’ whom ‘We Elected into Office’ as ‘Our Officials’ and whom we ‘Trusted’ to provide us with ‘Lawful Service’ (Don’t) with all of them having ‘Exceeded their Authority’. The ‘Fact’ is that ‘All the Systems’ (Government) only retain their ‘Positions of Power’ through ‘Abuse of the Publics Resources’ (Money/Revenue) all of which is ‘Directed against the Public’ so as to ‘Inhibit and Restrict’ them from ‘Seeking Justice’ this ‘Despite the Abuse’ (System Failure).

“The Problem is Guilt with a Failure upon the Part of the State to Take Responsibility for its own Failures”.

Everyone ‘Assumes’ that they are dealing with ‘Human Beings’ but ‘You are Not’, you are dealing with a ‘Minority Group’ of ‘Politicians’ who only retain ‘Authority’ through the measure of their ‘Indifference’ to you and your case this coupled by the extent to which they ‘Abuse Your Resources’.

You have to understand that ‘All Politicians’ are ‘Politically Motivated’ therefore they ‘All’ have ‘Hidden Agendas’ with ‘None of those Motives’ being for ‘Your benefit’ and ‘All these Ambitions’ are being ‘Funded’ through the ‘Abuse of Your Resources’ – they are all just ‘Devious Little Men’ whose greed gets in the way of their ‘Responsibility’ and that is to ‘You’ it called Lawful Service – and that is their ‘Achilles Heel’ since they are ‘Bound in Law’ to provide you ‘The Public’ with ‘Lawful Service’ and as ‘Public Employees’.

Here lays the ‘Problem’ because if ‘You the Public’ are not receiving ’Lawful Service’ from them then they are not ‘Providing You’ with what they are ‘Employed to Deliver’ so like any other ‘Public or Commercial Service’ (Fire them) by ‘Withdrawing Revenue’ upon the ‘Grounds’ of: ‘Failure of the State to provide Lawful Service’ this is something they are all bound in law to do.

No ‘Public Employee’ whether they are ‘Politicians, Judges, Police’ nor any other ‘Public Servant – Senior or Ad ministerial’ has a ‘Lawful Right to Lie, Deceive or Betray both the Public and the Nation’ since you (the Public) employ them to provide you with ‘Lawful Service’ in the form of the ‘Actual Non-Distorted Truth’ coupled with ‘Legitimacy and Lawfulness’.

A ‘Judge’ is bound in ‘Law’ to represent both the ‘Public in Law’ in addition to the ‘Law’ itself by ‘Upholding the Legitimacy of Law’ through his ‘Actions’, he has no ‘Lawful Right’ to express ‘Prejudice nor Perversion’ and within this ‘Neither the Public nor the State’ has a ‘Lawful Right’ to influence the ‘Outcome of Justice’ through the ‘Perversion of that Judge’.

The ‘Police’ are bound by the same constraints of ‘Law’ to provide the ‘Public with Lawful Service’ as are ‘Politicians as Public Representatives’ with any ‘Failure to Deliver Lawful Service’ being their ‘Failure in Law’ – Justice is a Profound thing.

You can discover more on this if you investigate some of the ‘Issues’ projected upon the ‘’ and ‘’ websites.

5.      I have an Issue which affects every British and American Citizen“Are we in a Recession?” or “Are your Governments Impoverishing ‘Us’ their ‘Nations’ through ‘Financial Abuses’ and ‘Constraints’ all of which are ‘Draining’ the ‘Economies’ of ‘Our Resources’ and all of which are being ‘Governed, Driven’ and ‘Directed’ by ‘Political Ambitions’ as a bid towards ‘World Order’ – in support for the ‘Anti Christ’ Anton, Antony or AnthonyAnton Iblis who is named by a King and Prophet named Elijah in the Great Koran, he is also named and recorded in the Bible and the Torah – TRUTH without Prejudice for that is the TRUTH.

6.      There is an ‘Issue’ here; since your Governments actually are funding Brussels the Kingdom of Belgium which actually is the kingdom of the Belgae which was Bell/Belos/Beloch/Belog. This is the ‘European Government’ which will become the ‘World Government’ in due course (New World Order) additionally ‘All’ of this is being done using ‘Your Resources’ which have been extracted (taken) ‘Without Your Consent’ since you ‘Do Not Have a Lawful Say in It – Do You?’

An ‘Issue’ here is that if this is the ‘Truth’ then ‘You’ are ‘Sanctioning’ and ‘Supporting’ the ‘Anti-Christ’ of ‘Earth’ against (A) GOD be him Jehovah, Allah, Duw or Deus or God (the Devine Being and Creator). (B) his ‘Son’ who is ‘Prophesised to Come’ with him being ‘Krishna’ (by the Hindu and Seeks) called ‘Christopher’ (by the Jews and Muslims and ‘Christ’ (by the Christians). He is also projected within other cultures around the world with ‘All’ of them ‘Projecting him as the Son of God’ and all these cultures represent and relate to him as ‘Projecting Justice’ coupled with ‘The Sword of Truth’ which is ‘The Word of God’ being ‘Neither Distorted nor Perverted’.   

Within the above and for the record your ‘Authorities as Governments’ have:

Firstly through their ‘Actions’ they have ‘All Accepted Roles’ within the ‘New Global Administration’ all of which is ‘Treason against You’ (the Public) since it is ‘Not Publicly Sanctioned’ and/or ‘Endorsed’ by the ‘You’ (the Public) but done ‘Dishonestly’ and without your ‘Consent’ – “Are you even Aware of how much money is being diverted away from you to Fund this Crime against Humanity” – Clearly the Enslavement of Humanity through Impoverishment and Taxation is a Crime.

Secondly and My ‘Issue’ here is this: ‘That at no time within the ‘Past’ have they ‘Your Government’ and/or their ‘Representatives’ asked or requested ‘Permission from You’ (the Public) to ‘Take these Moneys’ which are being ‘Extorted through Revenue’ (Without Consent/Permission) and which are actually ‘Your Property’ (Resources). Furthermore through this ‘Criminal’ and ‘Fraudulent Action’ these ‘Revenues’ are being ‘Used and Diverted Out of your Country’ so as to ‘Fund’ and ‘Finance’ an ‘External Government’ which you have ‘Not Elected’ (it is therefore Not Sanctioned) and to which has ‘No Authority Over You’.

Clearly this is a Crime since ‘You the Public’ have not ‘Relinquished Your Sovereign nor your Independent Rights’ to (A) Your Freedom and Independence, (B) Your Sovereignty (Land Rights) as Independent Countries or Nations, (C) Additionally you ‘Elected’ your ‘Government to Serve You’ with ‘You Pay them to Provide You with Lawful Service’ and within that ‘Your Government has No Right in Law to Submit to the Authority to Any Other Internal or External Body’ (Foreign or Domestic).
7.      Compounding the ‘Above’ is the ‘Abuse of Law’ with any ‘Action’ your ‘Authorities’ have either ‘Sanctioned, Endorsed and/or Committed you Too’ against ‘Your Approval’ and ‘Without Your Consent’ as a ‘Nation’ (The Majority) being ‘Illegal’ therefore ‘Negated in Law’ (those Contracts and Actions are Void) since they are by any ‘Definition’ – ‘Illegal’ (Not Lawful).

8.      For the record: I do not have the ‘Right in Law’ to spend ‘Your Money’ even if ‘You Entrusted Me with those Resources’ since that would be a ‘Breach of Trust’ – therefore a ‘Crime’.

I do not have the ‘Right in Law’ to sell ‘Your Rights in Law’ to any ‘External Regime’ as that would be ‘A Defined Crime in Law’ (Treason) even if it was ‘Your President or Prime Minister’ committing that ‘Action’ (The nations Rights belong to the Nation and Not any one man or Minority Group – Elected or Not has or had the Right to Sell them or Sign them Away).

The ‘Issue’ here is that ‘Like France’ their ‘Government’ did not ‘Stand and/or Declare’ to their ‘Nation of People’ an ‘Intention to Relinquish their Nations Sovereignty’ with that ‘Failure to Disclose their Intention’ undermining the ‘Legitimacy of the Action’ – this same ‘Measure of Disclosure’ effects every other ‘Independent Nation in Law’ because there has to be ‘Legitimacy within the Law’ with any ‘Failure of the Law to Stand Legitimately’ or to be ‘Upheld’ thereby ‘Accountable in Law’ – ‘Negating and Undermining the Legitimacy of both the Action and the Law – this Failure undermining both the ‘State’ and the ‘Law’ itself with those ‘Actions Committed to by your Representatives’ becoming ‘Void in Law’. (The action was not Sanctioned by You since they did Not ask for Permission so it was not a Legal Transaction – was it?).

The other issue here is ‘Fraud’ since ‘Your Nations Resources’ are ‘Your Property’ with them being ‘Unlawfully Extracted’ and ‘Misappropriated’ by a ‘Minority Group’ with ‘Intent’ and that ‘Intention being Unlawful’ since it is not ‘Sanctioned by the Public’ whose ‘Resources they Are’ – ‘This is a Definitive Crime’.

‘Eirin’ the ‘Prophetess’ told the ‘Brythig Peoples’ he would come out of the ‘White Lands’ as ‘Blaidd Rhydd’ (the Free Wolf) 3,500 years ago; that they must prepare for his arrival – “Er Côf âg êr Deuthan’t” – ‘Remember for here He Comes’.

Christopher © 2012 (All Rights Reserved)

The Golden Dragon of the Gododdin it is also the baner of Owain Glyndwr - Y Ddraig Aur yn Syfedlog

Christopher D. J. Maylor © 2012 (All Rights Reserved)

Thursday, 30 August 2012

Historical Injustice or Serial Annihilation?

This is an amendment of an article I wrote earlier relating to ‘Historical Injustices’ and is intended for ‘Clarification’ also in order to ‘Highlight' and 'Address Issues’ which need further investigation.

Historical Injustices

“The definition of ‘Historical Injustice’ relates to an insular event of ‘Injustice’ and should be taken as such since it recounts ‘Single’ or ‘Multiple’ act(s) of mass atrocity committed against another race within and by a single ‘Genealogical Lifespan’ or ‘One Generation of People’.”

I wrote this as a response to an article on ‘Historical Injustices’ an issue which is under ‘Global Debate’, it is a serious issue which affects billions of people worldwide. The argument relates to ‘Land Rights, Human Rights’ along with ‘Justice’ for ‘Crimes’ committed against the ‘Indigenous Peoples’ by and through the invasion of their ‘Lands’ by ‘Foreign Peoples’ this to include a ‘Recognition’ for and of the ‘Scale of Atrocities’ committed against them by the ‘Ancestors’ of the ‘Current Generations’ with this defining through that action an ‘Acceptance of Guilt’.

Additional to this are the ‘Issues’ relating to ‘Recompense’ through both ‘Compensatory Awards’ (Financial Compensation) and ‘Land Settlements’ (The Return of Substantial Native Lands), these to include the recognition in law to both ‘Independence’ as a ‘Right to Re-consolidate’ and the ‘Indigenous Land Rights’ to include the ‘Complete Removal of Foreign Entities’.

This item has been Slightly Amended – for clarification of the Issues related:

So! I am in agreement that (A) owns the ‘Property’ despite the number of times that ‘property’ has been ‘transferred’ from (B to Z). However what about any property (B to Z) is holding or has erected upon that land? Clearly that property is not the property of (A) and neither did (B to Z) have ‘Lawful Rights’ to erect or hold property upon or within the land which belongs to (A).
Time does not impact upon the crime of ‘Theft’ since the ‘Property’ was neither ‘Lawfully Taken’ nor ‘Lawfully Received’ so despite the number of inheritors, beneficiaries or occupiers this ‘Property’ is still owned by (A).

Amendment in relation to Clarification: ‘It should be noted within this that (A) is defined as the Natives who compiled the ‘Race’ of the Individuals whose ‘Lands were taken through Atrocity’. It is not necessary the property of any one individual since these races may have been ‘Communal Based’, furthermore; the lack of ‘Written Land Titles’ are irrelevant since the concept of ‘Ownership’ is a ‘Western form of Dominance’. It should also be noted that ‘External Legal Systems’ are ‘Not Lawful’ when applied to ‘Foreign Bodies’ since the ‘Imposition of Foreign Law’ is not ‘Native too, Accepted by, Recognized and/or Binding’ since the ‘Imposition’ of ‘Foreign Imposed Law’ as a form of ‘Dominance’ over another ‘Race, Defines a Crime’.

Assuming that (A) recovers the ‘Land’ they are now left with the problem of removing the ‘Assets’ of (B to Z) which is neither the property nor the responsibility of (A) however they are ‘Illegally retained’ upon and within that holding.
Within the above however we are missing a point: Are the people of today responsible for the crimes of the past since: (A) they did not commit these crimes however; (B) they do descend from the ‘Perpetrators’ who actually did commit these ‘Crimes’ even though they were not alive themselves to ‘Engage’ within the ‘Action’?

(C) Question?

Do they ‘Sanction’ and ‘Endorse’ the ‘Crimes’ of both the ‘Past’ along with that of their ‘Ancestors’ through their continued presence; i.e.: ‘If they continue to retain and occupy the lands which were stolen through ‘Mass Atrocity’, with this action along with their presence attesting too and ‘Sanction’ thereby ‘Endorse the Crime’; are they ‘Equally Guilty’ (Aiding and Abetting all be it after the Fact)?

In relation to a ‘Tangible’ and ‘Provable Crime’ in relation to this ‘Issue’ with this being both ‘Admitted’ and ‘Recorded’ as a ‘Crime’ relating to ‘Theft’ through ‘Murder’ (Right by Conquest) which the English people committed against Wales (the indigenous British peoples) when they annihilated 280,000 people after their surrender from starvation and disease and after the 2nd war of Wales had ended 1276 (25 generations removed). Additionally after the ‘Slaughter of the Princes’ (mostly children) allocating for the ‘Theft of their Principalities’ with this being done on the pretext of putting down the ‘British Threat’ (Right of Recovery) forever whilst legalizing that ‘Land Theft’ beneath the precept of ‘Atrocity’ coupled with ‘Time’.

An argument here is that by ‘Putting down the British Threat Forever’ the English People have through the ‘Statement of their Actions Admitted to their Intention of Annihilation’ – an Arguable Point since it is Admittance.

 So within this we must become aware of the fact that ‘Time’ makes people ‘Complacent’ and through that ‘Complacency’ they ‘Accept, Sanction and Endorse the Crime’. And arguably this is a ‘Provable Point’ relating to the ‘Conditioning of People’ into ‘Accepting a Crime’ as being ‘Normal’. It is commonly seen within ‘Victims of Repetitive Abuse’ (both Sexual and Torture) with these ‘People’ becoming ‘Conditioned’ into ‘Accepting the Crime’ as being a ‘Normal Practice’ all be it that it is a ‘Violation’.

Within the above we must remember that the ‘Welsh’ (British People) are one of the only ‘Dominated Races’ (Non-Free races) left on earth with the entirety of ‘Britain’ being their ‘Lawful Property’ (Foreign Occupied). ‘Wales’ is a fragment of ‘Cambria’ (the true extent of Wales) which is occupied by foreign bodies at a ratio estimated at around 60 to 1 with the English imposing both a Government and English law upon them. The Welsh Assembly which is not a ‘Lawfully Elected Representative Government’ but ‘Foreign Imposed’ expresses this; clearly within this the ‘Indigenous’ have no ‘Right in Law’ be that ‘National’ (English Imposed) or ‘International’ since they are not ‘Free’ and that ‘Government’ does not ‘Represent them’.

The ‘Truth’ is that they are ‘Out-voted’ within ‘Elections’ at a ratio of ’60 to 1’, their ‘Government’ is representative of ‘Foreign Policy’ (Imposed); ‘Welsh Law’ was ‘Quashed’ during the ‘Owain Glyndwr’ fight for ‘Freedom’. English laws were passed ‘Oppressing’ them ever since within which even in modern history there have been ‘Incidences Attesting’ to the fact that they have been denied the ‘Right’ to speak and ‘Communicate’ within their own ‘Language’ or to ‘Depose England through Protest’ and as a youth ‘I witnessed a young man being Murdered by the English Authorities for that Action – ‘Holding a banner’ and Arguing for the Right in Law -To Be Free’.

Lands were clearly ‘Stolen through Murder’ and both ‘Evidences’ and ‘Admittances’ of this exist however the ‘Welsh are not Free’ nor are there plans to release the ‘Welsh’ from the ‘Grasp of England’. Clearly an ‘Imposed Government’ that represents ‘England’ coupled with ‘English Policy’ is not ‘Freedom’ nor does it resolve the ‘Issues’ of Historical Injustice’. Returning ‘Wales’ a fragment of ‘Cambria’ which itself is only a fragment of ‘Britain’ will not be ‘Justice’ for the ‘Welsh’ who have been ‘Systematically Annihilated’ over a period of 2,000 years 1st by ‘Rome’, 2nd by the ‘Saxon, Danish and Germanic coalition of Nations’ and 3rd Normans whom are ‘Black Danes’.

The resulting invasions forming 67 generations of ‘Serial Genocide’ Committed, Sanctioned and Supported by the ‘Invaders Countries of Origins’ with this being an ‘Endorsement and Sanctioning of the Crimes’ by those ‘Countries’.

So ‘where is the Justice’ and are the ‘English People’ of today equally guilty in ‘Law’ of sanctioning and endorsing the ‘Crimes of the Past’ through their continued ‘Occupation’ and ‘Presence’ coupled with their ‘Ownership of Properties’ upon ‘Lands’ which were stolen through ‘Mass Atrocity’ all of which was ‘Legalized within English law’.

Argumentative isn’t it? – But within everything written above we are clearly missing something since we are barely touching upon the ‘Issue’ of ‘Historical Injustice’ as such I am including the following.

Amendment: “As stated at the ‘Beginning’ the definition of ‘Historical Injustice’ relates to an insular event of ‘Injustice’ and should be taken as such since it relates to a ‘Single’ or ‘Multiple’ act(s) of mass atrocity committed against another race within a single ‘Genealogical Lifespan’ (One Generation of People).

However: ‘Historical Injustices’ as a ‘Term’ does not do ‘Justice’ to the ‘Crimes’ of ‘Serial Genocide’ which as ‘Crimes’ are committed by the ‘Genealogical Descendants’ of the ‘Original Perpetrators’ (Multiple Generations of People). These ‘Crimes’ may be seen within ‘History’ as ‘Repetitive Attacks’ which are spread out over ‘Centuries’ that over ‘Time’ severely ‘Diminish the Indigenous’ or even result within the ‘Crime of Annihilation’ (Clinical Eradication of a Nation) and either way it highlights an ‘Intention to Totally Exterminate’ for the ‘purpose’ of ‘Self-Gain’.
Such a ‘Crime’ is visible within the ‘Histories’ of the ‘English Peoples’ during their ‘Initial’ and ‘Extended Campaigns’ within ‘Britain’ against the ‘Britons’ (now called Welsh – 4th Century to Present Day), the ‘Picts’ (who merged with the ‘Scotts’ in the 9th Century and whom now form the Scottish Peoples – they enjoyed ‘Temporary Freedom’) additionally the ‘Irish’ who were originally ‘Invaded’ in the 5th Century through the Invasion and Occupation of Northern Ireland, they were again ‘Invaded’ within the 11th and 12th centuries and suffering repetitive ‘Assaults’ as ‘Atrocities’ until ‘Recent History’.”

Everything related immediately above relates to ‘Serial Annihilation’ which is not an ‘Isolated Crime’ but a series of ‘Repetitive Crimes’ all of which ‘Re-occur’ over ‘Extended Periods of Time’ (Centuries) and are inflicted upon the ‘Indigenous Peoples’ (Victim) by the ‘Descendants of the Invaders’ (Genealogical Descendants - Perpetrators). Clearly repetitive crimes are not ‘Isolated’ with them becoming extenuated over and by the passage of ‘Time’ since they are committed ‘Generation after Generation’ as ‘Re-Offences’. Additionally it should be noted that within this ‘Crime’ there is another ‘Hidden Crime’ with that being ‘Sup-plantation’, this ‘Crime’ relating to the ‘Slaughter of the Indigenous Peoples’ along with their ‘Children’ as ‘Extending Generations’ and the ‘Sup-plantation’ of the ‘Perpetrators Children in their Place’ which relates to the ‘Theft of Properties’ through the act of ‘Generational Annihilation’ as an ‘Unprecedented Crime’; the impact upon ‘Humanity is Immeasurable’.

For the Record: Within Britain alone 67 (Sixty Seven) generations of ‘People’ (as Native Descendants) have been ‘Eradicated from History’ through the act of ‘Serial Annihilation’ – their ‘Right to Life’ as a ‘God Given Right’ was ‘Violated’ by the ‘English People Combined’ (History Records Centuries of Serial Attacks with these being Crimes and Abuses, Legalized within English Law).  

Since writing the above I have included the following:

An Issue

Someone has stated that the ‘Past should remain within the Past’ and that we should ‘Dismiss the Dead’ as having ‘No right in law to have ever Existed’ (Right to Life) since the nature of the world we live in is built upon ‘Atrocity, Theft’ and the ‘Right of Abuse’ – clearly that is ‘False’ with neither this nor any other person having the ‘Right to Abuse others’ as either individuals or collective bodies. Within the above they have also stated that the son is not guilty of A/ the Initial Crime. B/ Perpetuating the Crime, C/ Endorsing the Crime through his/their continued presence and finally D/ Aiding and Abetting all be it after the fact thereby ‘Sanctioning’ that or those ‘Crimes’.

Amendment: I have an ‘Issue’ what if a man kills a woman in the heat of an argument; some may call that a ‘Crime of Passion’ (maybe it is maybe it isn’t – but he never had a right to take her life did he? – that ‘Life’ was clearly ‘Not His Property’).

What if a man kills multiple women – clearly a ‘Serial Crime’ to which there is ‘No Lawful Defense’ – This ‘Crime’ would be on a par with a case of ‘Historical Injustice’ however this still relates to an ‘Insular case of Injustice’ since it has taken place within a ‘Single Time frame’. Arguably this may also relate to ‘Multiple Crimes’ however they are all ‘Fixed’ within a ‘Single Genealogical Generation’.

  The problem here is that this still relates to an isolated event however in reality ‘Historical Injustices’ are still ongoing being ‘Repetitive Serial Events’ with ‘History Recording the Facts as Actions’ thus ‘Historical Injustices’ may not be an apt ‘Definition’ when relating to ‘Serial Genocide’ with this relating to the ‘Serial Crimes’ of ‘Multiple Generations’ of ‘People’ whom as a ‘Collective’ of ‘Individuals’ have been committing a ‘Series of Horrific Crimes’ not only within a ‘Fixed Point in Time’ but also as an ‘Extended Crime – Generation after Generation after Generation’; this clearly becoming something else.

So within this: ‘The man who has just killed multiple women has a son who has also perpetrated a similar crime and he has a son who is perpetuating this crime as are his descendents generation after generation until someone steps up and changes something’. This act of ‘Historical Injustice’ is recorded in ‘Time’ as a ‘Perpetual Crime’ of  ‘Serial Historical Injustice’ with every person descending from those ‘Original Perpetrators’ and whom have repeatedly attacked and perpetuated this crime being ‘Guilty’.

It is not that you descend from ‘Monsters’ it is a fact that you descend from a ‘Race of Men’ who through ‘Greed and Envy’ made it ‘Acceptable’ to commit these ‘Crimes’ in a ‘Time’ when they could ‘Easily Evade Justice’ through ‘Anonymity’. Within the above however and just because someone ‘States it is Acceptable’ that does not make it ‘Lawful’ with those people who are struggling to ‘Come to Terms’ with the depth of these ‘Crimes’ which were ‘Committed’ by their ‘Ancestors’ (in the past) being ‘Equal Victims’ (in a Sense) since the people who conceived them into this world ‘Did so upon, within and surrounded by a Crime’ thus ‘Condemning the Souls of their own Children even before Birth’ with this perpetuating an endorsement of the original Crime.

‘Yes’ it is ‘True’ that ‘You did not commit these Crimes’ however ‘You are Guilty’ of ‘Sanctioning’ and ‘Endorsing’ these ‘Crimes’ through your ‘Continued Presence’ – until you separate yourself as being ‘Morally Apart’ from your ‘Ancestors’ you will not be ‘Free of Guilt’. 

‘Recognition’ through ‘Awareness’ that there were indeed ‘Crimes’ is a ‘Beginning’ since it is a step towards ‘Reconciliation’ with that action ‘Separating you from the Past’ – “The only hope is within Redemption through Consolatory Recognition along with all that entails, but within this you also have to make an effort in order to Redeem yourself”.

People have to understand that: each generation of people descending from the original perpetrators of the crimes have with malice repeated and perpetuated these crimes through continuous attacks all of which have been directed against the indigenous. These crimes have continued generation after generation within some countries like ‘Britain’ for sixteen centuries (1,600yrs) and for the record there are ten (10) generations of people per 300yrs with people on average replicating every 27 ½ years therefore it is official that more than 50 generations of people have repetitively and systematically engaged within the ‘Crime of Serial Genocide’ within ‘Britain’ by perpetuating, actuating  and compounding the problem thus changing this from an ‘Isolated Case of Genocide’ perpetrated by a minority group into a ‘Serial Crime of Multiple and Repetitive accounts of Genocide’ resulting within the act of ‘Virtual Annihilation’.

To this end their descendents (the English people) are in all actuality ‘Guilty’ since they sanction and endorse the crime through their continued presence and their continued ‘Domination of the Indigenous people’ highlights the depth of ‘Guilt’.

            History records each and every conflict a nation of people engage within in exactly the same way as the State records Criminal offences thus building a picture in relation to ‘Serial Offences’ with each end every offence relating to a ‘Physical Action’ (an Event/ Crime or Atrocity).

It is not only the engagement (Conflict) which is recorded but the number of casualties on both sides and even though some of these may be generalized in relation to your opponent they do highlight the extent of the crime. It is fair to argue some of the numbers may be exaggerated or estimated on both sides however if we base our accounts upon the records of the victor alone accepting them as evidences then A/ they are admittance to the Crime, B/ they offer scale in proportion to the severity of that Crime and C/ they quantify the number of engagements conducted against the indigenous who in this case are the ‘Victim’ of ‘Non Provoked Repetitive Serial Attacks’ culminating in the ‘Loss of Innocent Life’.

Each one of those faceless people had lives, some had children and all had names and identities coupled with a ‘God given Right to Life’ and no ‘Deviant’ within any ‘Country of Earth’ has or had a right to ‘Extinguish that Right’.

This ‘Crime’ is only compounded by the ‘Severity of the Action’ since many ‘People’ not much different to ‘You personally’ were ‘Tortured and Violated’ during this process of ‘Systematic Annihilation’ (multiple accounts of Atrocity / Genocide culminating within the act of Annihilation’) – “You are Guilty of Aiding and Abetting all be it After the fact” – Technically you are ‘Sanctioning this Crime’ until you ‘Separate Yourself from it’.

            History records the ‘Facts’ as a set or series of ‘Conflicts’ perpetrated over long periods of time (centuries) with these ‘Repetitively Reoccurring’ for ‘Generations’ after ‘Generations’. To date ‘No Nation’ has been ‘Charged with Annihilation’ since the ‘Crime is Abhorrent’ even to consider; yet some ‘Nations Histories’ actually do ‘Record and Project this Crime’. There are ‘Incidences’ within ‘History’ which are even ‘Horrific’ by the standards of the ‘People’ within those ‘Time Periods’ – with some ‘Nations’ standing out from the rest (History Records). The ‘Issue’ of ‘Serial Genocide’ is so serious by its nature that it demands ‘Recognition’ despite the difficulties it raises since the depth of the ‘Crime’ affects every person within every nation on Earth.

Within the above: “If you cannot recognize the ‘Rights of Nations’ then you will never recognize the ‘Rights’ of any one individual – Injustice is a Crime”

                                                               Christopher © 2012

Further Response

I totally disagree with this ‘Perception’ since the ‘Perpetrator of the Original Crime’ has over the duration of time ‘Established & Enforced his Laws, Politics and Protocols upon the Victim’ who is also due to the ‘Severity of the Crimes’ in the ‘Minority’. Within this it is fair to argue that in today’s world the ‘Laws’ are  being used to A/ legitimate the crime through complacency and public acceptability (the conscious impact of Time). B/ this same group who has in the past perpetrated a series of serious criminal offences on a par with ‘Atrocity’ (singular and/or multiple Massacres not excluding isolated crimes to individuals or small groups – culminated impact); you cannot honestly believe there is going to be any legitimacy within this nations laws or the manner and measure of their justices when so much injustice exists not only within ‘Past History’ but spread across time even to the ‘Present’ (History unfolding – this comment included).

Within my original comment relating to ‘Historical Injustices’ I neglected to point out a fundamental and poignant fact, there are evidences that some nations are ‘Guilty’ of ‘Serial Atrocity’ with these being repetitive perpetual crimes committed by the ‘Genealogical descendants’ of the ‘Original Perpetrators’. History records ‘Actions as Matter of Fact’ with each individual engaged within that action supporting the original action. For instance if A/ steals a house through the murder of the ‘Parental Owners’ (Lawful Possessors) and bequeaths it to his son B/ who has ‘No Lawful Claim’ and whereby ‘B’ perpetuates the ‘Original Crime’ by killing or inhibiting the children of the ‘Parental Owners’ (Lawful Claimants) inhibiting them from taking ‘Lawful Possession’ with this crime being perpetuated even further ‘Generation after Generation’ ‘C. D. E. F’ etc with each generation compounding the damage done to the descendents.

Can you honestly accept or justify that action or the fact that the ‘Institutionalized Justice and Legal Systems’ present in current society which are mostly ‘Foreign Imposed’ are going to be ‘Fair & Lawful’. Do you honestly believe these systems which have been imposed upon the ‘Victim’ who in this case are the ‘Genealogical and Biological Descendants of the Lawful Owners of the lands which the Foreign Invaders stand upon’ are not going to express ‘Lawful Justice’ or on the other hand is it going to be ‘Corrupted by Prejudice’ as to cover up and endorse the ‘Crime’.

Each ‘Victim’ had a ‘Name’ and more than that they had a ‘Right to Life’, they had a ‘Right to enjoy all the Privileges you take for Granted that to include Children’ and by killing each and every single one of them ‘They have been Denied that Right’ with each and every person who would have ‘Descended from them simply Compounding the depth of the Crime’. Additionally to this the crime is further compounded by the ‘Descendents’ of those ‘Historically recorded Perpetrators’ who habitually actuate and perpetuate the ‘Crime’ in order to ‘legitimate their presence. It is a ‘Fact’ that the only countries to date who have openly ‘Acknowledged’ this ‘Crime’ and who have attempted at some level to ‘Repair the Damage’ done to ‘Indigenous Peoples’ are ‘America, Canada and Australia’ all of whom are the ‘Youngest Nations on Earth’ and ‘All of whom returned some measure of lands to the Native Peoples’; those countries should be ‘Proud of that Fact’.

It is ‘Impressive to talk about these issues’ when you are on the other side of the coin and to ‘Debate Justice’, I have no ‘Human Rights’ (Actual) because of ‘Judicial Perversion’ (Foreign Imposed) and my ‘Nation’ are not ‘Free’ their ‘Government’ is in ‘Name Only’ again (Foreign Imposed) along with ‘Foreign Law’ also imposed and has been for centuries – Justify That – if you cannot ‘Recognize in Law a Nations Right to be Free, how will you ever recognize any single individuals Right to be Free’.

I record and operate within the fields of ‘genealogy & history’ all of which identify those people ‘Modern people express indifference to’ however the ‘Crimes of the Past’ have a habit of ‘Reoccurring’ so how should you be recorded and remembered when the ‘Shoe is on the other foot’. They say: A leopard cannot change its spots’ so how can a people along with their descendents change when they won’t even ‘Accept’ that they have ‘Perpetrated Crimes’.

As for the ‘Descendents’ of these ‘People’ they are clearly ‘Guilty’ since ‘History’ records each and every crime as a ‘Perpetuation’ of the ‘Original Crime’ (Justice is a Bitter Pill but then so is the Truth) it does not mean that every person is ‘Bad’ or ‘Supports the Crime’ since clearly that is not the case. If you cannot accept there has been a crime and try to make amends then how can you visibly affect a change in people like ‘Me’ who have ‘No human Rights’ and are ‘Displaced in Law’?  

The fact is that ‘Historical Injustices’ never ceased they continue even to this day as an ‘Epitome of Evil’ affecting both ‘You’ and ‘Myself’.

Nothing will change until peoples attitudes change in relation to ‘Authority, the Victim and Themselves’ whilst recognizing that ‘Complacency is the Endorsement of a Crime’ – ‘Authority needs to accept Accountability’ – ‘Individuals need to develop Awareness in addition to Social Conscience’. Furthermore ‘Justice must stand Legitimately within the Sum of Itself as should All Lawful Institutions – without neither Distortion nor Perversion’ with the ‘Truth’ becoming ‘Paramount as the Actual undistorted Truth’.

Christopher © 2012